The 1957 Topps cards, like this Yankee Power Hitters example, are rarely found with superb centering
The 1957 Topps cards, like this Yankee Power Hitters example, are rarely found with superb centering

I can still remember, years ago, when the centering of a card was not really a major issue with most collectors. In fact, as long as the card was attractive and sharp, most collectors ignored any centering dilemmas. Today, centering has become increasingly important to some and a noticeable price premium, in some cases, will be added to those cards that are notoriously off the mark.

Where do we stand today?

Let me ask you this. Would you rather own a 1963 Topps Mickey Mantle that exhibits all the attributes of a Mint 9 except centering (a PSA Mint 9oc, maybe 75/25 both ways) or a well-centered PSA NM-MT 8? According to the market over the last few years, collectors seem to be more willing to pay for the well-centered NM-MT cards despite the fact that the Mint 9oc is actually a tougher card to find by definition (it's actually a Mint card with a centering qualifier, a higher grade by pure number). In fact, in some rare cases, collectors will pay just as much for a Near Mint 7 if the 9oc is drastically off the mark.

Why is there such a discrepancy in price?

Eye-appeal, eye-appeal, eye-appeal. Anytime you are looking to buy a PSA graded card, or any card for that matter, pure condition is of the utmost importance. The next step, for many collectors, is determining whether or not the card, regardless of the actual grade, exhibits the visual appeal that they personally desire. For some, centering is the focus of that desire and it is very apparent that, at this point in the market, certain centered copies are bringing premiums at auction and retail levels.

For example, 1948 Leaf and 1957 Topps baseball cards (both traditionally found with poor centering and/or tilts), are selling for outstanding money if the cards are well-centered. Keep in mind that we are not talking about cards that are perfectly centered, we are talking about cards that are merely well-centered for the issue in question. Most 1948 Leaf Babe Ruth cards or 1957 Mickey Mantle cards are seen with poor centering so the well-centered examples seem to have no problem finding a home, and those homeowners are paying more to acquire them.

For other collectors, eye-appeal may fall on the strength of the color or gloss; maybe the overall sharpness of the card. For instance, I know many collectors who actually prefer rough-cuts because some cards were manufactured in that fashion. The rough-cut is simply the way in which the card was produced. Other collectors despise rough-cuts because, once again, it just bothers them on a personal level. It may not technically affect the condition but, if it bothers you, then you shouldn't by it. Ultimately, the collectors have to decide for themselves as to what attributes they like or dislike in a card after a technical grade has been rendered.

Obviously, when a collector spends a large sum of money on a sportscard, they do have some thought of investment on their mind. It's hard to say whether or not this centering trend will continue. On some level, it seems as if the high-grade off-center cards might be undervalued at this point considering the price levels they are currently moving at, especially in Mint 9oc.

One argument, in favor of off-center cards, would be that a grade is based on the preservation of the card. In other words, if the card is Mint in all other respects, then the card is still Mint. The counter argument would be that print lines, staining, chipping, etc. are all condition obstacles that can be found on freshly manufactured cards, before a collector even opens the pack. In other words, why should centering be approached any different? Once again, we are left with a very debatable topic.

Regardless of what I may think, there's one piece of advice that I think everyone should consider.

In the words of Digital Underground, "Do what ya like." It's the only true way to achieve collector satisfaction.

Tall Boys, like these Topps hockey examples from the 1960’s, are often found off-center due to the narrow borders
Tall Boys, like these Topps hockey examples from the 1960’s, are often found off-center due to the narrow borders

Joe Orlando has been an advanced collector of sportscards and memorabilia for over 30 years. Orlando attended Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California where he studied communications and was the starting catcher for the baseball team. After a brief stint in the minor leagues, Orlando obtained a Juris Doctor from Whittier Law School in Southern California in the spring of 1999. During the last sixteen years, Orlando has authored several collecting guides and dozens of articles for Collectors Universe, Inc. Orlando has also authored two books for Collectors Universe. Orlando's first book, The Top 200 Sportscards in the Hobby, was released in the summer of 2002. His second book, Collecting Sports Legends, was released in the summer of 2008. Orlando has appeared on numerous radio and television programs as a hobby expert including ESPN's award-winning program Outside the Lines, HBO's Real Sports and the Fox Business Network, as the featured guest. Currently, Orlando is the President of PSA and PSA/DNA, the largest trading card and sports memorabilia authentication services in the hobby. He is also Editor of the company's nationally distributed Sports Market Report, which under Orlando's direction has developed into a leading resource in the market. Orlando also contributed the foreword and last chapter to The T206 Collection: The Players and Their Stories, a 2010 release, and to The Cracker Jack Collection: Baseball's Prized Players, a 2013 release. Recently, Orlando helped put together a new hobby book entitled The 100 Greatest Baseball Autographs, which was released in the summer of 2016.